The Clinical Trial Struggles No One Talks About (But Everyone Faces)

Clinical trials are the backbone of medical advancement. Whether it’s a large-scale oncology study or a tightly regulated BA/BE (Bioavailability/Bioequivalence) trial, there’s a lot that goes into making sure everything runs smoothly. We often hear about the big challenges—recruitment, regulatory hurdles, or data integrity—but what about the small, everyday issues that make a clinical operations manager’s job quietly stressful?

Over the past few months, we’ve had conversations with several clinical research professionals—project leads, CRA teams, data managers, and site coordinators. And while the “big” problems are discussed openly, it’s the small, repetitive, practical ones that often get swept under the rug. Yet these issues, if unaddressed, can lead to delays, errors, and frustration.

Let’s talk about those not-so-glamorous challenges. And more importantly, let’s talk about how even small features in a clinical trial software can help solve them.

  1. The Spreadsheet Maze Nobody Escapes

Almost every clinical operations manager we spoke to admitted this: no matter how many systems are in place, there’s always that one spreadsheet used to track something vital. It could be subject visit windows, lab kit inventory, or even a running list of protocol deviations.

The problem? These sheets live on desktops. Or worse, they’re emailed around. Version control is a nightmare, and if someone is out sick, no one knows where the latest file is. It’s not a huge failure, but it’s a daily friction point.

Quick Fix: A centralized dashboard with built-in trackers—even for non-critical data—can save hours each week and reduce errors. Something as simple as an alert for overdue visits can make life easier.

  1. The Silence Around Subject Randomization Errors

Here’s one that’s almost taboo to talk about: missteps in subject randomization, especially in crossover BA/BE studies. We’ve heard of cases where the wrong sequence was assigned, or a backup subject was mistakenly randomized before the main volunteer was marked ineligible.

These errors may not always lead to regulatory consequences, but they create internal panic and can derail timelines.

What Helps: Auto-validation before randomization. Systems that flag inconsistencies—like attempting to randomize without meeting eligibility checks—can act as a second brain for the team.

  1. Protocol Deviations That Slip Through the Cracks

No one wants protocol deviations. But let’s be honest—almost every study has a few. The issue isn’t just about the deviation itself; it’s about how it’s reported and reviewed.

We’ve seen cases where deviations are handwritten, scanned, emailed, and then… forgotten. Some are never reviewed until a monitor finds them weeks later. The paper trail (or lack of one) leads to stress during audits.

Simple Solution: A protocol deviation log that allows quick entry, flags items pending review, and creates a soft reminder workflow can improve visibility—without adding to documentation burden.

  1. Manual Logs: Equipment, Dosing, and That Sticky Notebook

Clinical trials are becoming digital, yes. But we’re still finding critical logs written in spiral notebooks tucked away in pharmacy units or dosing rooms. The irony? These are logs that need to be 100% accurate—like equipment temperature logs, IP dispensing logs, or dosing timestamps.

We heard a story of a dosing delay that went unnoticed for hours because the log sheet was misplaced. These aren’t high-tech issues. They’re trust and traceability issues.

What Can Be Done: Digital logs with auto time-stamping and user accountability are now part of many clinical trial software systems. You don’t need a full-blown eSource setup—just a module that allows digital entry with audit trails.

  1. How BiZNET Helps in BA/BE Trials (Real Talk)

For those involved in BA/BE studies, the pressure is real. Everything needs to run like clockwork—right from subject check-in to IP dispensing, sample collection, and data lock. A minor miss can lead to a protocol deviation or even study rejection.

This is where BiZNET, our specialized clinical trial solution for BA/BE studies, becomes more than just software. It’s designed with real-world clinical operations in mind—solving the everyday issues that often go unnoticed but cause delays, errors, and stress.

Here’s what sets BiZNET apart:

  • Faster trials through seamless digital clinic-lab-pharmacy synchronization, reducing lag and manual handovers.
  • Volunteer traceability made foolproof with IRIS scan and wristband tracking—no mix-ups, even during high-volume studies.
  • Barcode-enabled workflows that ensure clean, audit-ready trails for every activity.
  • Secure, role-based dynamic forms that adapt to user roles, ensuring only relevant fields are shown and sensitive data is protected.
  • AI-driven entries with real-time auto-checks—flagging missing or incorrect data before it’s too late.
  • Live alerts and dashboards to keep teams informed of deviations, pending tasks, or red flags as they happen.
  • Scalable for global, multi-site trials, so your operations grow without added complexity.

One Clinical Operations Manager shared:
“Before BiZNET, we tracked deviations and adverse events manually. Half of them wouldn’t get escalated till monitors visited. Now, if anything is out of spec—even something as small as a missed vitals entry—it’s flagged. We don’t miss things anymore.”

BiZNET isn’t just about digitization—it’s about giving teams control, clarity, and confidence.

Regulatory compliant, multi-functional Clinical trials management software solution for CROs

START TYPING AND PRESS ENTER TO SEARCH